tundramagi wrote:There's nothing wrong with the name.
Your argument that the name will alienate code contributors is absolutely rediculious and pure unabashed speculation that is common from the mouths of players who never really did any development. Many people love to give advice when they have no basis to do so.
Ah ha ha. There
is something minor wrong with the name; it's merely not pronounced phonetically from how it's spelled. There are no English words where "ui" is pronounced "E ә"--it's simply backwards. *shrug*. We English-speakers do manage fine for 'cough' and 'bough' not rhyming. Same goes for 'go', 'so', 'no', and then 'do'. This is a lot of talking for a leetspeak spelling of the name of a
video game, heh heh.
Ignoring all that... Wow dude, i hope you were trolling; I wasn't attacking the game so there's no need to get defensive and offensive. It's certainly true that people love to give advice when they have no basis to do so: you were rude to somebody you don't know, somebody new to the community, and in calling someone else's ideas ridiculous you demonstrated that you also "love to give advice when they have no basis to do so". Here's the basis which I used for my statement and which you claimed doesn't exist, though; I'm a programmer for a living and so are most of my still-gaming friends. Rude people, obvious-yet-unaddressed bugs (unhealthy dev community?) and, yes, even the turn-off name have all been mentioned as reasons not to participate. Anecdotal, sure--but it doesn't take much to disprove a broad statement made in the negative. In any case, I'm burying my hatchet. Two of my favorite xkcds:
386 438