I'm feeling similarly like the others here on the forums. I am not a person having any strong opinions about this, though. Sure, I also contributed code and sideprojects to the game, and as it looks like, game content that was GPL'd is being released, not being GPLed anymore (if I understood this correctly).
Also some other "practices" (or simply things that happened) have not been correct, and I do disrespect some people now (you know who I mean) that I used to have respect for.
However,
I think it's "funny" that a company seriously thinks they can earn money
- with a FPS shooter on a console (paradox)
- of which a free (as in, for the people who don't know what "free" means, for them it's "no charge") alternative on a PC(!) exists
- with a "brand name" of a game that is, when looking at it from some other perspective (or even real numbers like player count, etc.) is absolutely a niche product
So in the end, the target market, imo, are people who are either stupid or are clueless about the alternative (I admin though that I am biased, since I'm neither a fan of consoles in general, nor could find a reason to play shooter games on consoles). I think that this console game will simply fail, mostly because I think that it won't be able to compete with other famous brands/games like Halo, etc.
Of course, it will be interesting to see whether my prediction will come true or not.