[MAP] castlebunker (alpha) - (with zip) A castle vs a bunker

[ultimate_evil]

I made a zip of the bsp as esteel suggested. It did cut the file size to 1/3rd (10 megs)
https://69.113.27.92/data/castlebunker37.zip

I don't think my maps are bad.

A castle vs a bunker.

This will be a CTF map.

(a few brushes need my custom opensource textures but the rest is normal nexuiz textures).

What do you think of it?

BSP 37 megs.
https://69.113.27.92/data/castlebunker37.bsp

Map file 7 megs.
https://69.113.27.92/data/castlebunker37.map

Tell me what you think.

[ultimate_evil]

I can be contacted at https://69.113.27.92/mmsys/index.php if need be.

[ZyanKLee]

there are some BIG problems with HTTPS-certificate ... and NO I would not click on "trust forever".

[ai]

I would not even click on his links

[divVerent]

Yes, our dear MikeeUSA should really make a working SSL certificate or use normal HTTP.

Otherwise, we find out too easily that it's him again - really, that broken SSL certificate spoils all the fun

There are actually three issues with the certificate: it's expired (and it is expired since 2003), it's for a host name that points to another IP, and the host name is not even used in the URL.

[ultimate_evil]

Invalid ssl is not really any less secure then regular HTTP.

Do you really want me to put it up on the http server? I could, but I don't see any advantages to doing so.

Anyone have ideas for how I should flesh out the base. I am thinking neo-tokyo/halo-space-station type mix.

I've also made a few useful items (piano, globe) that could be prefabs for other maps (this is all opensource).

[ZyanKLee]

how about using a project at sf.net ?

[divVerent]

Invalid ssl is not really any less secure then regular HTTP.

True, but why not use regular HTTP then?

Do you really want me to put it up on the http server? I could, but I don't see any advantages to doing so.

I do see one: no pile of annoying messages by the web browser. No need to use --no-check-certificate on wget. Faster access.

Seriously, if you want SSL without the security, use a VALID self-signed certificate. That's just one message - the "this certificate was not signed by a CA I know" one. Not three dialog boxes as one has to answer on your site ("certificate is expired", "not signed by a trusted CA", "invalid host name"). When I visit your website https://cat2.dynu.ca, I actually get these three messages THREE TIMES. Means I have to click okay NINE TIMES just to be able to see your website. That's more annoying than commercial popups.

[Shoe]

[quote=in another thread]Man... I bet you wish you had my connection, or my talent. [/quote
lolololololololol

Sorry, the other thread was closed before I could get a comment And that invalid certificate made me think it was a scam site until I did research to find out it was our old pal. All of the warnings that popped up aren't going to help anyone trying to download from that server.

[cortez]

Maybe you can upload it on something like filefront or something else?