ds01 wrote:@tehtux did you try increasing your res on the higher-end machine? Even a GF 5900-FX ultra is faster at 1280x1024 than it is at 640x480.
I did (much the same results), though I didn't post them. I ran the tests at 1280x1024 16bit, no effects and lowest quality. The 2500+ handled itself quite well, posting good numbers though still being effected greatly once a character came into view. The 3200+ 64 bit struggled, though performed roughly the same as at 640x480...
The reason why I kept it so low in the res was to stress the CPU more than the GPU, as the CPU's are *kinda* close in Mhz, though one's 64 bit and one's 32 bit. The GPUs are WAY different, and I didn't want to affect the results too much. A 1600x1200 test would kill the GeForce2 Pro, though the 6600GT would be ok.