Very slow speeds issue.

If you've had any problems with Nexuiz, or would like to report bugs, post here.

Moderators: Nexuiz Moderators, Moderators

Very slow speeds issue.

Postby Snippet » Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:28 am

Hey, I got a problem :)

When I boot up Nexuiz, its slow as hell. Also, I see the menu but the center part is all black (I dont know its suppsoed to be) and the sound is all choppy. I am using linux (debian) and my video card is an onboard ""Intel Graphics Adapter V6.14.10.3847"" running on a ""AsusP5GD1-VM-UAY0Z"" motherboard with an ""Intel 3.0 (hyperthreading"" cpu and 1 gig of ddr ram. I am using the 2.4.27-2-386 Kernel, I did not download any extra drivers for the video card so whatever linux gave me as default is whats running.

Thx for any help, Snippet
Linus is my homeboy.
Snippet
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:21 am

Postby Ed » Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:14 am

If you're running the standard drivers, that may be the problem. Try doing:
Code: Select all
glxgears

from a terminal and see what you get. Just for comparison my 6600GT gets around 8000 and that runs Nexuiz well on fairly high settings.

Nexuiz is very graphically demanding and it may just be that you need to run lower detail settings. Try
Code: Select all
exec med.cfg
vid_restart

in the Nexuiz console.
Laters losers.
Ed
Forum addon
 
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 12:32 am
Location: UK

Postby Snippet » Sat Aug 19, 2006 8:49 am

When running GLXgears I get the following:

beaulieu@debian:~$ glxgears
Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0".
4289 frames in 5.0 seconds = 857.800 FPS
5543 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1108.600 FPS
5420 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1084.000 FPS
5060 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1012.000 FPS
5560 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1112.000 FPS
5500 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1100.000 FPS
5421 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1084.200 FPS
5480 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1096.000 FPS
5620 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1124.000 FPS
5420 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1084.000 FPS
5520 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1104.000 FPS
5480 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1096.000 FPS
5577 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1115.400 FPS
5500 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1100.000 FPS
5520 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1104.000 FPS
5700 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1140.000 FPS
5520 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1104.000 FPS
5573 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1114.600 FPS
5587 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1117.400 FPS
5520 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1104.000 FPS
4920 frames in 5.0 seconds = 984.000 FPS
4450 frames in 5.0 seconds = 890.000 FPS
(it keeps going but its all similar)

The commands "exec med.cfg and vid_restart" made no difference.
Linus is my homeboy.
Snippet
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:21 am

Postby KadaverJack » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:26 am

Snippet wrote:Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0".

Looks like you don't have 3D acceleration activated.
Try
Code: Select all
glxinfo | grep direct
Does it say "direct rendering: Yes"? If it says no, make sure your xorg.conf (or XF86Config if you are using sarge) is setup correctly.

If you are using testing or unstable, you might have more success with the xserver-xorg-video-i810 package from experimental (the intel 945GM GPU in my notebook didn't work with the drivers from unstable, but works fine with newer ones in experimental).

But even if you get 3D acceleration working, you probably have to use "exec low.cfg" in Nexuiz to get playable framerates. The 945GM in my notebook is barely playable (13-30fps with 3 bots on the smallest map at default setting...). But if my quick google search was right, your mainboard should have a free PCI-E slot, so you can upgrade your graphics card... ;)
KadaverJack
Site admin and forum addon
 
Posts: 1102
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:42 pm

Postby SavageX » Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:11 am

Well, on an early Pentium-M notebook with integrated 8xx graphics I achieved playable framerate... but I think that was in Windows.

I don't know if the Xorg drivers have comparable performance to their Windows siblings.
SavageX
Site Admin
 
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:34 am

Postby narvik86 » Sat Aug 19, 2006 1:09 pm

http://intellinuxgraphics.org/ maybe this will be helpful? i never had intel card, so don't know...
narvik86
Member
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 5:02 pm
Location: Poland

Postby Snippet » Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:36 pm

I checked out the XF86Config-4 file but it seems that everything is enabled. the DRI and GLX modules are enabled and the DRI mode is set to 0666.

Maybe its just he crappyness of my card, I'l go pick one up next week. Thanks for all your help guys.
Linus is my homeboy.
Snippet
Newbie
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:21 am

Postby Urmel » Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:44 am

Snippet wrote:Maybe its just he crappyness of my card


Of courze it's the crappyness of your "card". Actually it isn't a card at all, it's just emulating one and takes power from CPU and RAM.

Not meant as an offence, but sometimes I really wonder why so many ppl don't read the performance tips thread

http://www.alientrap.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=12

on this forum before they post their problems with onboard VGAs in here.

I'll keep my fingers crossed for you that the AsusP5GD1-VM-UAY0Z isn't that variation with no AGP or PCIe slot for a VGA card (like I have a complete P4/3G standing around here, wondering wtf to use it for) :P
uncomfortable
random
mean
embarrassing
limited
Urmel
Forum addon
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 10:06 am
Location: Offline

Postby SavageX » Sun Aug 20, 2006 11:59 am

Urmel... wrote:
Snippet wrote:Maybe its just he crappyness of my card


Of courze it's the crappyness of your "card". Actually it isn't a card at all, it's just emulating one and takes power from CPU and RAM.

Not meant as an offence, but sometimes I really wonder why so many ppl don't read the performance tips thread

http://www.alientrap.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=12

on this forum before they post their problems with onboard VGAs in here.

I'll keep my fingers crossed for you that the AsusP5GD1-VM-UAY0Z isn't that variation with no AGP or PCIe slot for a VGA card (like I have a complete P4/3G standing around here, wondering wtf to use it for) :P


Do I perceive a tiny bit of aggression there? ;)
SavageX
Site Admin
 
Posts: 442
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:34 am

Postby Urmel » Sun Aug 20, 2006 12:06 pm

SavageX wrote:Do I perceive a tiny bit of aggression there? ;)


Yeah, but not against Snippet I have to point out and I apologize if it seemed so :D

What really raises my aggresions is the dang computer manufacturers who sell crap like that :evil:
uncomfortable
random
mean
embarrassing
limited
Urmel
Forum addon
 
Posts: 1744
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 10:06 am
Location: Offline

Next

Return to Nexuiz - Support / Bugs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron