outrage!

[The mysterious Mr. 4m]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alientrap

i was shocked!

[Psychcf]

This happened to me with psych desktop, there was an article about it, and then wikipedia raped me and said it was blatant advertising.

I wish I could smack every single wikipedia admin who has deleted a page because of spam, when it was a perfectly acceptable article. Get's me so pissed.

Looks like Alientrap just got raped too:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... =Alientrap

Edit: k fixed it, although the original was much better

[esteel]

I do not think the wikipedia alientrap page was very much advertising but that page did not have a whole lot of info on it so i can still understand why it was removed.

[The mysterious Mr. 4m]

UNREMARKABLE??????????????????????????????

i will send the Turd Muffin Raid™ on them.

[SavageX]

Well, "unremarkable" isn't too strong a word. So... what information would an Alientrap article contain?

"They are developing Nexuiz and trying to get Zymotic off the ground."

Then perhaps a "staff list" nobody cares about.

I can absolutely see why the article got canned.

edit: If somebody feels funky that funky person may perhaps include a small Alientrap section in the Nexuiz article... and upload better screenshots That'd be way better than a four line Alientrap article IMO.

[Xeno]

Alienwho? Huh?


Wtf, even belly button lint has its own Wikipedia page.

It really gives you some perspective on things, huh?

[The mysterious Mr. 4m]

i tell you.... they are just bias(s)ed