by Irritant » Mon Aug 27, 2007 4:00 pm
Threads like this often leave me scratching my head. Well, everyone has their ideas of what a game should be, and there's nothing wrong with voicing that opinion, but the orginal post seems so uninformed, and well...condescending to the makers of Nexuiz.
Some people think, oh an engine is based off of the Q1 engine, it *must* be old tech and have crappy graphics, without considering that 99.99% of the renderer is completely rewritten. Sometimes you just want to beat the sense into them that they apparently don't have.
Most opensourced freeware games DO share technology and pool resources, indirectly at worst. That's the whole point of Open Source. Project A comes up with cool new effect, projects B and C look at code and implement into their engines. There are some amazingly great and well written OS engines right now, that while no, they aren't Crysis or Id Tech5, they are still at least on par with the Unreal 2.5 engine or Doom 3.
Like SavageX says, content is usually the biggest issue. UT2k4 looks amazing not so much because of what it's engine is doing(much effects are faked, which also isn't always bad when considering performance), but because it's content has amazing detail and effects put to good use.
Equal opportunity fragger