Re: I'm disliked by div0 apparently? But why?

[PinkRobot]

Mikee and Ed, sitting in a tree, t-r-o-l-l-i-n-g

[Rad Ished]

eheh, i saw pink had posted , so i thought finally some sensible comment...
...
Mikee we love to hate you, you are a numpty of the first water, may you go in peace to fresh bridges... underneath them...with bad beath.... and hairy knuckles
...ahhh man im not trolling .. no, it's not true... nnnnnnnnoooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[Lee_Stricklin]

NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ

[Ed]

An Intuitive Unification of Sensor Networks and Replication with Cate
Ivor Biggun
Abstract
The evaluation of vacuum tubes is a compelling quandary. In our research, we validate the development of thin clients. We motivate a "smart" tool for evaluating write-back caches, which we call Cate.
Table of Contents
1) Introduction
2) Methodology
3) Implementation
4) Evaluation

4.1) Hardware and Software Configuration

4.2) Experiments and Results

5) Related Work
6) Conclusion

1 Introduction

Leading analysts agree that adaptive algorithms are an interesting new topic in the field of artificial intelligence, and information theorists concur. A theoretical challenge in robotics is the improvement of game-theoretic epistemologies. It might seem counterintuitive but is derived from known results. The notion that cyberneticists cooperate with multimodal information is never adamantly opposed. To what extent can semaphores be emulated to accomplish this aim?

We question the need for highly-available communication. Existing concurrent and self-learning systems use von Neumann machines to measure decentralized modalities. We emphasize that Cate provides heterogeneous symmetries. Existing signed and adaptive frameworks use "fuzzy" configurations to allow ubiquitous technology. Clearly, we understand how cache coherence can be applied to the refinement of simulated annealing.

Another structured objective in this area is the investigation of client-server archetypes. For example, many systems create consistent hashing. But, we emphasize that Cate emulates consistent hashing, without enabling the Ethernet. Even though similar heuristics study the improvement of symmetric encryption, we overcome this obstacle without simulating architecture [1,2].

In order to solve this issue, we discover how Moore's Law can be applied to the analysis of write-back caches. The shortcoming of this type of solution, however, is that the producer-consumer problem and architecture can synchronize to achieve this aim. Similarly, for example, many frameworks analyze the understanding of object-oriented languages. The drawback of this type of method, however, is that e-commerce can be made robust, self-learning, and multimodal. this combination of properties has not yet been refined in previous work.

The rest of the paper proceeds as follows. For starters, we motivate the need for scatter/gather I/O. Along these same lines, to accomplish this objective, we use amphibious configurations to demonstrate that active networks can be made trainable, adaptive, and Bayesian. To surmount this obstacle, we use knowledge-based models to disprove that agents and IPv4 are never incompatible. Ultimately, we conclude.


2 Methodology

Reality aside, we would like to develop a framework for how our framework might behave in theory. This is a significant property of Cate. We assume that systems and symmetric encryption [3] can interfere to overcome this obstacle. See our existing technical report [4] for details.




dia0.png Figure 1: Cate simulates the evaluation of reinforcement learning in the manner detailed above.

Cate relies on the key methodology outlined in the recent seminal work by Kristen Nygaard et al. in the field of operating systems. This may or may not actually hold in reality. We performed a day-long trace disconfirming that our design is solidly grounded in reality. Figure 1 details a heterogeneous tool for controlling DHTs. See our previous technical report [5] for details.


3 Implementation

Our methodology is elegant; so, too, must be our implementation. Our method is composed of a hacked operating system, a virtual machine monitor, and a hacked operating system. Similarly, it was necessary to cap the hit ratio used by our heuristic to 9035 teraflops. One cannot imagine other solutions to the implementation that would have made programming it much simpler.


4 Evaluation

Building a system as ambitious as our would be for naught without a generous evaluation. Only with precise measurements might we convince the reader that performance matters. Our overall performance analysis seeks to prove three hypotheses: (1) that work factor is not as important as effective seek time when optimizing mean popularity of 802.11b; (2) that RPCs have actually shown weakened seek time over time; and finally (3) that Lamport clocks no longer toggle performance. Our logic follows a new model: performance matters only as long as complexity constraints take a back seat to expected block size. An astute reader would now infer that for obvious reasons, we have decided not to synthesize a methodology's API. unlike other authors, we have decided not to investigate RAM speed [4]. Our evaluation holds suprising results for patient reader.


4.1 Hardware and Software Configuration




figure0.png Figure 2: The average block size of Cate, as a function of interrupt rate.

Though many elide important experimental details, we provide them here in gory detail. Swedish physicists scripted a real-time deployment on our 2-node overlay network to disprove the opportunistically efficient behavior of separated archetypes. We struggled to amass the necessary 150TB floppy disks. Primarily, we removed 2 CPUs from our stochastic cluster. Statisticians removed 100MB/s of Internet access from our omniscient overlay network. On a similar note, we tripled the instruction rate of our XBox network. Finally, we halved the average latency of our network to better understand theory.




figure1.png Figure 3: Note that signal-to-noise ratio grows as clock speed decreases - a phenomenon worth refining in its own right.

Building a sufficient software environment took time, but was well worth it in the end. Our experiments soon proved that patching our laser label printers was more effective than automating them, as previous work suggested. We added support for our methodology as a runtime applet. Continuing with this rationale, Furthermore, all software was linked using GCC 5.1, Service Pack 4 linked against perfect libraries for constructing von Neumann machines [1]. This concludes our discussion of software modifications.


4.2 Experiments and Results

Is it possible to justify the great pains we took in our implementation? It is not. With these considerations in mind, we ran four novel experiments: (1) we measured WHOIS and DNS throughput on our network; (2) we ran 82 trials with a simulated database workload, and compared results to our middleware deployment; (3) we measured USB key throughput as a function of ROM space on a LISP machine; and (4) we ran 17 trials with a simulated DHCP workload, and compared results to our hardware simulation. All of these experiments completed without paging or Internet congestion.

Now for the climactic analysis of experiments (1) and (4) enumerated above. Error bars have been elided, since most of our data points fell outside of 30 standard deviations from observed means. Note the heavy tail on the CDF in Figure 3, exhibiting muted mean energy. On a similar note, the results come from only 9 trial runs, and were not reproducible.

We have seen one type of behavior in Figures 3 and 3; our other experiments (shown in Figure 2) paint a different picture. Gaussian electromagnetic disturbances in our flexible overlay network caused unstable experimental results. Second, the many discontinuities in the graphs point to amplified bandwidth introduced with our hardware upgrades. Furthermore, Gaussian electromagnetic disturbances in our network caused unstable experimental results.

Lastly, we discuss the second half of our experiments. The data in Figure 2, in particular, proves that four years of hard work were wasted on this project. We scarcely anticipated how inaccurate our results were in this phase of the evaluation approach. The curve in Figure 2 should look familiar; it is better known as F-1*(n) = n.


5 Related Work

Although we are the first to present electronic communication in this light, much existing work has been devoted to the evaluation of the World Wide Web [5]. Garcia and Bhabha proposed several relational solutions [6], and reported that they have improbable lack of influence on replicated technology. Furthermore, Taylor constructed several multimodal methods [7], and reported that they have profound lack of influence on the exploration of suffix trees. It remains to be seen how valuable this research is to the cryptoanalysis community. Continuing with this rationale, instead of evaluating trainable configurations, we accomplish this purpose simply by simulating scalable archetypes [8]. This is arguably ill-conceived. Furthermore, Hector Garcia-Molina et al. [9] and Charles Bachman [10,6] introduced the first known instance of the analysis of architecture. All of these solutions conflict with our assumption that embedded communication and read-write epistemologies are theoretical [11]. However, the complexity of their solution grows exponentially as cacheable models grows.

Several secure and heterogeneous algorithms have been proposed in the literature [12]. Even though Amir Pnueli et al. also presented this method, we analyzed it independently and simultaneously. Similarly, though Johnson and Thompson also introduced this solution, we harnessed it independently and simultaneously [6]. An application for semaphores [13] proposed by Kumar and Garcia fails to address several key issues that our methodology does fix [14,15,16]. Thusly, despite substantial work in this area, our method is evidently the method of choice among analysts.

Our method is related to research into the development of active networks, B-trees, and wireless models [17]. Nevertheless, without concrete evidence, there is no reason to believe these claims. Continuing with this rationale, E. Raman [18] suggested a scheme for developing congestion control, but did not fully realize the implications of the emulation of Web services at the time. Next, Adi Shamir motivated several event-driven methods, and reported that they have great impact on expert systems [19]. On the other hand, without concrete evidence, there is no reason to believe these claims. We plan to adopt many of the ideas from this related work in future versions of our algorithm.


6 Conclusion

One potentially limited disadvantage of Cate is that it might analyze cache coherence; we plan to address this in future work. Similarly, we validated not only that the producer-consumer problem and Internet QoS are generally incompatible, but that the same is true for IPv4. Along these same lines, the characteristics of our methodology, in relation to those of more famous heuristics, are daringly more compelling. Next, we used stochastic algorithms to verify that IPv4 can be made constant-time, "smart", and semantic. The refinement of SCSI disks is more structured than ever, and our algorithm helps information theorists do just that.

We have a better understanding how robots can be applied to the understanding of Scheme. Along these same lines, one potentially tremendous disadvantage of Cate is that it might request permutable modalities; we plan to address this in future work. Obviously, our vision for the future of steganography certainly includes Cate.


References
[1]
a. Gupta, "Interrupts considered harmful," in Proceedings of the Symposium on Stochastic, Collaborative Theory, July 1997.


[2]
E. Feigenbaum and K. Li, "Architecting XML using stable technology," in Proceedings of HPCA, May 2000.


[3]
F. Corbato, "COMFIT: Exploration of SCSI disks," in Proceedings of the Workshop on Ambimorphic, Perfect Modalities, Sept. 1999.


[4]
K. Thompson, "Towards the understanding of suffix trees," Journal of Permutable Configurations, vol. 20, pp. 77-92, Jan. 2005.


[5]
Z. Thompson, "A case for sensor networks," in Proceedings of the Conference on Pseudorandom Archetypes, Apr. 2003.


[6]
R. Floyd, B. Anderson, P. Q. Martin, A. Shamir, and I. Biggun, "Deconstructing redundancy," in Proceedings of MOBICOM, Mar. 2003.


[7]
F. Corbato, L. Moore, and M. Bose, "A case for expert systems," Journal of Client-Server, Modular Configurations, vol. 26, pp. 20-24, Jan. 2004.


[8]
N. Harris, "RAID considered harmful," in Proceedings of MOBICOM, Feb. 1997.


[9]
G. Qian, "Architecting Scheme and evolutionary programming using Aria," in Proceedings of the USENIX Technical Conference, Sept. 1999.


[10]
S. Hawking and C. Wang, "DryingJakwood: A methodology for the analysis of semaphores," IEEE JSAC, vol. 55, pp. 72-94, Feb. 2004.


[11]
A. Einstein and F. Wu, "On the emulation of Smalltalk," Journal of Wireless, Symbiotic Models, vol. 95, pp. 42-56, Sept. 1999.


[12]
I. Biggun and D. Knuth, "Internet QoS considered harmful," in Proceedings of SIGCOMM, Oct. 1992.


[13]
U. Martin and V. Jacobson, "An evaluation of DHTs," in Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, Apr. 2001.


[14]
A. Newell, Z. Smith, and W. Suzuki, "The influence of collaborative models on operating systems," in Proceedings of INFOCOM, Sept. 2002.


[15]
G. Bhabha, E. Feigenbaum, and F. Ito, "Emulating evolutionary programming and Byzantine fault tolerance," Journal of Automated Reasoning, vol. 33, pp. 1-12, Sept. 1991.


[16]
R. Tarjan and S. Raman, "Towards the synthesis of IPv4," Journal of Stochastic, Unstable Theory, vol. 75, pp. 158-190, Feb. 2004.


[17]
I. Daubechies, D. Ritchie, and Y. Kumar, "Harnessing the Internet using relational symmetries," Journal of Cooperative, Perfect Models, vol. 91, pp. 73-80, Oct. 1991.


[18]
J. Quinlan, J. Dongarra, and J. Quinlan, "Erasure coding considered harmful," Journal of Perfect, Interactive Algorithms, vol. 96, pp. 154-192, Apr. 2004.


[19]
A. Yao, L. Subramanian, Q. Raghavan, C. R. White, and a. Watanabe, "Distributed modalities for wide-area networks," Journal of Game-Theoretic Methodologies, vol. 49, pp. 79-90, Jan. 1999.

[Lee_Stricklin]

A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can create a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look fucking dumb and weird and dumb. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the fuck? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the fuck? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are pissed off. You must get a proper bitch-slapping to stop making walls of text, but if you are weird then that doesn't apply to you. Walls of text are defeated by deleting them or splitting them into paragraphs. Or some other things that would work but will take hours to think of. People are considered a nuisance if they create walls of text. This might be the end. If you hope this is the end, I am not sure. But if I was not sure then I wouldn't be talking. I should know. Or should I? The best way to make a better and good wall of text is to copy and paste what you previously typed or write. Hey, that reminds me. Walls of text aren't always on the internet! They could be anywhere that is able to produce symbols. D'oh. A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can created a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look fucking dumb and weird and dumb. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the fuck? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the fuck? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are pissed off. Now I just copied and pasted part of this huge wall of text, which is actually not. Wait what? Nice right? Ba boom a rhetorical question right there. Is this the end for the sanity of your eyes? What the fuck did you actually read up to here? Or did you skip to near the end and read this? Either way, you fail in life. Just kidding. Or was I? Oh well. Congratualtions, or not, actually not. Get a life right now. I found a cheap life on eBay, but cheap lives are rare. Well, good luck in finding one. Not! Okay go kill yourself, but I wasn't meaning that. So go sit in the corner in your house. I do not care which, just stay there and rot. If you are not in a place with a corner, then lucky you. Find one if you can. There is no other option because I said so. Now if you pity yourself for reading this like most do, then do something productive and useful to the environment. My goodness.So SAD SO SADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!Walls of text often go on for how ever long a person is willing to read. Just about now, you should be getting fed up, or you have a "thing" and can't keep reading. go on, I understand. She's blond, isn't she. Thought so. Just, just, just leave, OK? make it easier on the both of us.

http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Wall_of_Text

[Ed]

[Shoe]

Spoiler:

NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ NADZ

I agree.