halogene wrote:halogene wrote:a_grue wrote:2. even if they bend over the name, that won't make AT an appropriate FOSS maintainer
I might add that there is always the possibility to take further actions, including setting up another statement that clearly states a course of action or consequences. Is there anything in the text that is expressing something you couldn't agree to? Because looking at your explanation I am only seeing things that are missing from your point of view. If not, then you could, in theory, still sign it and start to prepare a follow up text that includes the items that you think are missing.
Just a thought, but of course it is your own decision and I respect that in any case.
According to the letter, the dispute will be settled if IllFonic changes the name. I, however, advocate either p.3 here, or plan A here. Both of these two options suggest that a name change would be insufficient. The former doesn't seem relevant anymore, so right now I see fork as the only solution.