Nexuiz rated?

[esteel]

It'd probablt get a T rating from ESERB (at least it should, if it got M for parts of bodies flying after deaths that'd be insane).

Just wait for Nexuiz 1.5.1 it will have new gibs (the old ones have had insanely high polycount).. there is a nice navzngrq, fgvyy chzcvat urneg (rot13 encoded not to spoil it for everyone.. )

[leileilol]

not an openquartz gib

[esteel]

not an openquartz gib

What do you mean? It IS an openquartz gib as far as i know..

[tChr]

It'd probablt get a T rating from ESERB (at least it should, if it got M for parts of bodies flying after deaths that'd be insane).

Just wait for Nexuiz 1.5.1 it will have new gibs (the old ones have had insanely high polycount).. there is a nice navzngrq, fgvyy chzcvat urneg (rot13 encoded not to spoil it for everyone.. )

Is it a good sign that i can read that without technical help?

Cool btw.. allthoug maybe a little morbid?

[KadaverJack]

Is it a good sign that i can read that without technical help?

esteel: next time you should better use double rot13 encription, that won't make it that easy for tChr

[tChr]

Is it a good sign that i can read that without technical help?

esteel: next time you should better use double rot13 encription, that won't make it that easy for tChr

rotfl

[divVerent]

Is it a good sign that i can read that without technical help?

esteel: next time you should better use double rot13 encription, that won't make it that easy for tChr

No, txet gnisrever is a better encryption.

Or why not: reverse, then rot13, then unreverse, then unrot13? As you know, f^-1(g^-1(f(g(x)))) usually isn't x, so this should work out quit well.

[esteel]

Is it a good sign that i can read that without technical help?
Cool btw.. allthoug maybe a little morbid?

YOU told ME to get a girlfriend.. now seeing this and that you are the master spamer makes me think you just want to distract from the fact that you need this much more

Morbit is good.. and i doubt many people will notice it, the action is just too fast.

I think i'll use quad-rot13 the next time

[tChr]

Is it a good sign that i can read that without technical help?

esteel: next time you should better use double rot13 encription, that won't make it that easy for tChr

No, txet gnisrever is a better encryption.

Or why not: reverse, then rot13, then unreverse, then unrot13? As you know, f^-1(g^-1(f(g(x)))) usually isn't x, so this should work out quit well.

"unreverse" "unrot13"
what?

[esteel]

"unreverse" "unrot13" what?

unrot13 is just rot13 again.. double rot13.. and unreverse = reverse again.. double reverse.. so both together are just as good as 'nothing done at all' just as is double rot13 itself