alientrap-forum-archives

by **esteel** » Thu May 31, 2007 4:07 pm

The ingame update message should also soon be online.. some DNS stuff might make it take a while to kickin..

by **[RBI]Karl Ranseier** » Thu May 31, 2007 7:26 pm

A little propaganda attempt of mine:

http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=564266

by **Psychcf** » Thu May 31, 2007 7:31 pm

Time to download it!!! w00t!

by **Urmel** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 9:26 am

re. Me back. I am quite disappointed for one thing: the old crappy rocket launcher model is still default. What's the damn reason for not including the fine weapon model Morphed created? I really don't understand why you keep holding on the old model

by **esteel** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:50 am

Well quite a few like that model for just looking powerpacked and the new model had some problems with the bumpmaps making it really ugly at higher settings..

by **LordHavoc** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:00 pm

esteel wrote:Well quite a few like that model for just looking powerpacked and the new model had some problems with the bumpmaps making it really ugly at higher settings..

Or put more simply: Some people (including me) think the new one looks really bad, the old one doesn't look good but it doesn't look bad either.

by **Urmel** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 1:27 pm

Well, actually I already sensed what Havoc said to be the true reason :twisted:

For me Morphed's model was more usable for the main reason that it didn't take you such a big part of the whole screen, and thats the reason why the current model keeps sucking for me (amongst not really such a few ppl). Iirc that was the major voice in that thread where Morphed introduced his new model, nevermind...

by **Psychcf** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 2:12 pm

I don't seem to see a difference performance wise, maybe a little it less lagging but that's about it. I like some of the new features like autorecording demos, though. I think it's alot better then 2.3 though, it shows.

by **Urmel** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:23 pm

I could be wrong, but maybe you use a config.cfg copied from an older version? I did that when testing the beta until esteel gave me the hint to create a completely new one, which solved that problem immediately.

by **esteel** » Fri Jun 01, 2007 4:02 pm

It did? Hmm the old configs should be (mostly) compatible, but yeah its easy to test, just rename config.cfg or move to save place and try again..

Hmm and some use cl_maxfps to limit the fps to a maximum number.. then it will be hard to notice an increase unless you old fps were below that limit

alientrap-forum-archives

Nexuiz 2.3

Who is online