Current Mockup
Willis wrote:The slogan: Don't like the grandma slogan. Sorry I don't have anything better to demonstrate, but obviously this is a tough one, it has it's own thread. If I think of something, I'll post it there.
In the worksWillis wrote:Overall appearance: Generally, the layout is good. Personally, I like the large download button in the header, specifically the one with the circled down arrow which has become a universal symbol for a download. The size is not needed there, they will find that out on the next page, and as has been suggested, adding free to the button might be helpful. I like the developer logo/link being on the left side and not in the header, it just fits better that way.
The majority of people decided it would be better on the side. This allowed me to add a download button for the mappack as well.
Willis wrote:Layout: the developers button should probably be above the donate button since the header is currently "Help Wanted", it just makes more sense.
Vermeulen asked me to remove this completely.
Willis wrote:Buttons: specifically the developers & donate buttons, they need less gloss. If you want to add a bit of gloss to a hover image rollover or something, thats fine, but they just look bad over-glossed.
I think it looks better with the current mockup but I'm open to other's opinions on this.
Willis wrote:Second, the screenshots button needs to be updated in two ways: 1) it really doesn't need the Nexuiz name there, at that point people should know this is the Nexuiz website, and 2) it should just refer to media in general, not specifically screenshots, unless we're separating the media pages.
To us, Nexuiz is not necessary, we know what it is, we've heard the name a million times. To a new user however, Nexuiz isn't the easy name to remember and any reiteration we can get away with, I suggest we do. However, Vermeulen has the final say in this.
I can change it to say media or something of the like though.
Willis wrote:however, news articles having image-based text isn't generally a good idea unless there is an image generator to go along with it (otherwise general website maintenance becomes too difficult).
Don't worry, that text will be HTML. I will use a div container with the gradient background image.
Willis wrote:Then the last thing, what are your plans for a video UI? Is this hosted on the website, or embeded from somewhere else, what types of controls will we have? From using various flash-based video players, I personally highly prefer on that gives the simple control of changing play/pause by clicking anywhere on the playing video. Other than that, the UI in your mock-up looks very fitting, had to judge by a static picture (and an image of Q3).
Well, at first I was thinking of using a 3rd party such as
www.stage6.com (the featured player) but since that's based off divx player, it's taking a chance / shooting yourself in the foot.
The solution I'm leaning towards now is a high def FLV using a free player such as
this one.
Though the featured video could (and should still) be uploaded to various video sites to increase publicity as well.
Willis wrote:Lastly, scale: How do you currently plan on handling it? It's impossible to judge from a static image

Fixed width. Stretchable height.