outrage!

Post anything on anything here

Moderator: Moderators

Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:28 pm

Mon Apr 30, 2007 11:26 pm

  • This happened to me with psych desktop, there was an article about it, and then wikipedia raped me and said it was blatant advertising.

    I wish I could smack every single wikipedia admin who has deleted a page because of spam, when it was a perfectly acceptable article. Get's me so pissed.

    Looks like Alientrap just got raped too:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?tit ... =Alientrap

    Edit: k fixed it, although the original was much better
    User avatar
    Psychcf
    Forum addon
     
    Posts: 1554
    Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:38 pm
    Location: NY, USA

Tue May 01, 2007 10:13 am

Tue May 01, 2007 10:16 am

Tue May 01, 2007 11:56 am

  • Well, "unremarkable" isn't too strong a word. So... what information would an Alientrap article contain?

    "They are developing Nexuiz and trying to get Zymotic off the ground."

    Then perhaps a "staff list" nobody cares about.

    I can absolutely see why the article got canned.

    edit: If somebody feels funky that funky person may perhaps include a small Alientrap section in the Nexuiz article... and upload better screenshots ;) That'd be way better than a four line Alientrap article IMO.
    User avatar
    SavageX
    Site Admin
     
    Posts: 442
    Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:34 am

Mon May 07, 2007 5:47 am

  • Alienwho? Huh? :twisted:


    Wtf, even belly button lint has its own Wikipedia page.

    It really gives you some perspective on things, huh? :P
    Last edited by Xeno on Tue May 08, 2007 1:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
    Xeno
    peregrinus originis incognitae
     
    Posts: 396
    Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:42 pm

Mon May 07, 2007 9:23 pm



Return to General Discussion




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest