Ubuntu 8.10 Intrepid Ibex Desktop

Post anything on anything here

Moderator: Moderators

Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:20 pm

  • As far as I can see, this is finally heading into a cool direction for the average graphics fetishist.
    Looking at all these mockups made me realize what bugged me the most when I was trying Ubuntu. It was the default system font. It may sound weird, but imo this was the ugliest thing on Ubuntu, and it was never changed. I hope, that they finally included a more reader-friendly font, where the words don't look as if they were smacked a n d t h a t s p a c i n g s u c k e d t o o . Of course, you could change the default font and skin and everything, but as a noob to Linux in general this is the stuff that made me feel not right from the start.

    Now here's some interesting stuff.
    First mockup, I assume
    Clear Intrepid
    Good Dark Theme
    Dark Orange
    Sharp Chocolate
    Silver Wings
    Ubuntu Dark #1
    Ubuntu Dark #2
    Ubuntu Dust
    Dunno the name :P

    All this can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Intrepid/

    This seems like the final skin and looks pretty cool to me. I'm seriously considering to get this thingie on my not-yet-existant laptop.
    I'M BATMAN!
    User avatar
    HarryButt
    Keyboard killer
     
    Posts: 560
    Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:51 pm
    Location: Hamburg, Germanistan

Fri Sep 19, 2008 8:56 am

  • It's not even brown. Great. Kubuntu with KDE 4.1.x will be nicer IMO.
    Ed
    Forum addon
     
    Posts: 1172
    Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 12:32 am
    Location: UK

Fri Sep 19, 2008 9:41 am

Fri Sep 19, 2008 10:47 am

  • Some of the mockups look very nice. But looking at the video from the alpha it is the same thing again. GTK is too limited to achieve the nice effects in the mockups.
    "It's a long story kid. You don't wanna hear it. I don't wanna tell it."
    User avatar
    dIM
    Alien
     
    Posts: 160
    Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 4:10 am
    Location: DD ger

Fri Sep 19, 2008 11:21 am

  • dIM wrote:Some of the mockups look very nice. But looking at the video from the alpha it is the same thing again. GTK is too limited to achieve the nice effects in the mockups.


    What GTK limitations are you referring to? I haven't spottet anything in the mockups yet I couldn't imagine being doable with GTK - much of that is compositing, which isn't in the responsibility of the toolkit.
    User avatar
    SavageX
    Site Admin
     
    Posts: 442
    Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:34 am

Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:20 pm

  • gnome vs kde flamewar starts in 3...2...1....
    The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom.
    - W.Blake
    User avatar
    Daedalus
    Alien trapper
     
    Posts: 311
    Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:29 pm
    Location: Interzone

Fri Sep 19, 2008 12:49 pm

  • GnomeDE sucks!

    KNOME sucks!

    XFluxCEnlightenment sucks!
    1. Open Notepad
    2. Paste: ÿþMSMSMS
    3. Save
    4. Open the file in Notepad again

    You can vary the number of "MS", so you can clearly see it's MS which is causing it.
    User avatar
    divVerent
    Site admin and keyboard killer
     
    Posts: 3809
    Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:46 pm
    Location: BRLOGENSHFEGLE

Fri Sep 19, 2008 1:00 pm

  • In my opinion the windows xp luna beats both gnome and kde looks, even macOS looks pathetic in comparison.

    *runs off and never dares to look into this thread again*












    for the ones that might think I was being serious: I wasn't. I just wanted to see if I could attract some trolls ;)
    <Community>: Why was the name "Nexuiz" licensed to IllFonic in a way that allows IllFonic to use the name without any suffix or subtitle for a commercial console game?
    <Lee Vermeulen>:
    <Community>: http://www.xonotic.org
    User avatar
    halogene
    Alien trapper
     
    Posts: 465
    Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 8:31 am
    Location: http://www.xonotic.org

Fri Sep 19, 2008 1:30 pm

  • Ed wrote:It's not even brown. Great. Kubuntu with KDE 4.1.x will be nicer IMO.


    KDE 4.1.1 is still pretty unusable. There is a huge lack of options and dual monitors... forget it. Maybe by 4.2 it'll be usable. But as a power user, I found it hindered my performance more than anything.
    User avatar
    [-z-]
    Site Admin and Nexuiz Ninja
     
    Posts: 1794
    Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:20 am
    Location: Florida

Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:10 pm

Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:30 pm

  • Psychcf wrote:Hey, it's dave!

    This puzzling exclamation aside, the new human theme they're including is lightyears ahead of the old human theme, and works well with the exception of firefox elements, where the dark brown buttons and drop-downs have black text.
    :)
    Keyboard killer
     
    Posts: 590
    Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:09 pm

Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:34 pm

Wed Oct 01, 2008 10:22 pm

  • I found this today. Looks like an even more noob-friendly distribution than Ubuntu or Mandriva. (in fact it's an Ubuntu-fork, thus compatible to its repositories) Very Vista-esque Start menu for the Windows-users out there.
    It seems to have a better hardware compatibility than Ubuntu too.
    The problem/bless is that it uses proprietary plugins out of the box, which doesn't quite match the Open Source philosophy, but seems to work. And that's what Average Joe wants from an OS right from the start. Gotta try to foist this on a friend of mine, whose PC has been all mixed up by a nice trojan. She's gonna be my guinea pig ;)
    I'M BATMAN!
    User avatar
    HarryButt
    Keyboard killer
     
    Posts: 560
    Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 4:51 pm
    Location: Hamburg, Germanistan

Thu Oct 02, 2008 3:44 am



Return to General Discussion




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest