Are non-mutually exclusive polls stupid?
Moderator: Moderators
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:22 am
-
Do you hate polls whose answers are not mutually exclusive?- Ed
- Forum addon
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 12:32 am
- Location: UK
-
i laughed
the spice extend life!
the spice expand conciousness!
the spice is vital to space travel!
sooooo.. tell me what you want, waht you really-really want
I will proceed directly to the intravenous injection of hard drugs, please.-
tChr - Forum addon
- Posts: 1501
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:11 pm
- Location: Trondheim, Norway
-
-
good one
The road of excess leads to the palace of wisdom.
- W.Blake-
Daedalus - Alien trapper
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:29 pm
- Location: Interzone
-
-
Yes, those of us who prefer green socks need checkbox polls instead of radio buttons.- :)
- Keyboard killer
- Posts: 590
- Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:09 pm
Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:14 pm
-
Ed wrote:Do you hate polls whose answers are not mutually exclusive?
WTF are u talking about?????
uncomfortable
random
mean
embarrassing
limited-
Urmel - Forum addon
- Posts: 1744
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 10:06 am
- Location: Offline
-
Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:45 pm
-
Urmel... wrote:WTF are u talking about?????
A mutually exclusive poll would be where none of the answers conflict, for instance, Yes or No. In a non-mutually exclusive poll the answers conflict as several of them may be true at once or they all be false. Most polls seem to make this mistake and you end up with someone saying 'I can't vote in this poll because my view is not covered by any of the options/more than one option'.- Ed
- Forum addon
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 12:32 am
- Location: UK
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Information
-
- Who is online
- Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest