tZork wrote:divVerent wrote:That's how most artists are. They don't care for that legal stuff.
what the fuck?! have you been taking classes from mikee on how to offend large groups of ppl at once? you know better then that. at least i thought you did.
No, it's true - but not meant as an insult. Either you're an artist, or you know the laws well. Legal stuff is very complicated, and if you use your time to work on your art, you have no time and no interest to read and understand the laws well enough. Plus, most artists simply don't care, they think "everyone else uses samples from various sources, it's normal, so I do it too".
See also posts of samples on some websites, most people there saying "it's combined from <this commercially released sample> and <this sample found on some website>". It is simply normal... but illegal.
http://www.hammersound.com/cgi-bin/soun ... tLength=15
"This is a soundfont I created from samples of a mellotron choir."
"Contains synthetic organs and "sampled" harpsichords, also acoustic guitars and a few good voices from other sound- fonts."
"4 drumloops from the sample CD Neolithic Beats"
"Sampled from a Future Music CD"
http://www.hammersound.com/cgi-bin/soun ... tLength=15
"It is a stereo Chinese Style Orchestra Hit SoundFont sampled from CD"
"Superb female voice soundfont which has been composed out of mixed and processed opera voices that sound spacious, deep, and expressive."
"My first SoundFont! It is a combination of TronStrings, Campbells Cello,matrix strings and Bright Mellotron. Thanks to all above who contributed their fonts! sfArk (2.64MB/3.67MB)"
"This is a great orchestral Soundfont i made with samples i found on the net."
None of this is GPL compatible, or even legal to use at all.
Well, there are exceptions to this:
"I recorded this today using myself and a mic. You won't find these samples anywhere else, E-Mail Me - <mail address>"
But most such stuff you find on the internet is illegal, because their authors simply don't care about that legal stuff. They care about making something that sounds/looks good, but they don't feel it's their task to learn all the laws. They just take some samples from somewhere, don't care from where, and work hard on improving them, and mixing them with others.
And actually, neither should they have to be lawyers to make music. The copyright system is stupid. But it is there, and we have no power to change it to make more sense, so exactly this can become fair use. IMHO remixing samples should be considered fair use, and even allow them to be used for ANYTHING (that is, they should become copyrighted by the editing guy and lose the original copyright once actual artistic work had been done on them, as long as the artist got the samples using legal means, e.g. buying a sample CD).
Currently, if you buy a "royalty free" sample CD, it does not allow you to redistribute the samples, but the GPL may require you to do so, thus such samples can't be used for GPLed stuff.
If these CDs would allow you to make your own samples based on them by remixing, we'd have much less of a problem, as all that stuff on the net would be safe to use then.
1. Open Notepad
2. Paste: ÿþMSMSMS
3. Save
4. Open the file in Notepad again
You can vary the number of "MS", so you can clearly see it's MS which is causing it.